Insights & Statistics
Hall of fame and data-driven insights about MEP voting patterns.
Most Independent MEPs
MEPs who vote against their group majority most often.
1
Lukas SIEPER
NI · Germany
56.4%
176/312
2
Emmanouil FRAGKOS
ECR · Greece
55.1%
178/323
3
Galato ALEXANDRAKI
ECR · Greece
51.2%
108/211
4
Maximilian KRAH
NI · Germany
51.1%
24/47
5
Charlie WEIMERS
ECR · Sweden
49.8%
159/319
6
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ
NI · Romania
49.6%
123/248
7
Alvise PÉREZ
NI · Spain
49.0%
98/200
8
Beatrice TIMGREN
ECR · Sweden
47.9%
159/332
9
Dick ERIXON
ECR · Sweden
47.9%
158/330
10
Kristoffer STORM
ECR · Denmark
46.9%
135/288
Most Aligned MEPs
MEPs who vote with their group majority most consistently.
1
Andrius KUBILIUS
PPE · Lithuania
100.0%
29/29
2
Bas EICKHOUT
Greens/EFA · Netherlands
100.0%
320/320
3
Bruno TOBBACK
S&D · Belgium
99.7%
327/328
4
Camilla LAURETI
S&D · Italy
99.7%
329/330
5
Anna CAVAZZINI
Greens/EFA · Germany
99.7%
327/328
6
Kathleen VAN BREMPT
S&D · Belgium
99.7%
309/310
7
Terry REINTKE
Greens/EFA · Germany
99.7%
310/311
8
Irene TINAGLI
S&D · Italy
99.4%
324/326
9
Christine ANDERSON
ESN · Germany
99.4%
324/326
10
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN
Greens/EFA · Germany
99.4%
308/310
Highest Absence Rate
MEPs who missed the most main votes while present at the session.
1
Henna VIRKKUNEN
PPE · Finland
30.4%
7.0 missed
2
Christophe HANSEN
PPE · Luxembourg
30.0%
6.0 missed
3
Andrius KUBILIUS
PPE · Lithuania
17.1%
6.0 missed
4
Péter MAGYAR
PPE · Hungary
16.9%
20.0 missed
5
Eszter LAKOS
PPE · Hungary
16.2%
45.0 missed
6
Dóra DÁVID
PPE · Hungary
15.4%
46.0 missed
7
Kinga KOLLÁR
PPE · Hungary
14.9%
39.0 missed
8
András Tivadar KULJA
PPE · Hungary
14.8%
42.0 missed
9
Kinga GÁL
PfE · Hungary
14.7%
44.0 missed
10
Gabriella GERZSENYI
PPE · Hungary
14.4%
39.0 missed
Group Cohesion
How unified each political group votes on average.
1
S&D
333 votes analyzed
96.4%
cohesion
2
Greens/EFA
333 votes analyzed
96.1%
cohesion
3
PPE
333 votes analyzed
93.2%
cohesion
4
Renew
332 votes analyzed
93.1%
cohesion
5
ESN
333 votes analyzed
90.3%
cohesion
6
The Left
333 votes analyzed
86.1%
cohesion
7
ECR
333 votes analyzed
84.2%
cohesion
8
PfE
333 votes analyzed
81.7%
cohesion
9
NI
333 votes analyzed
65.1%
cohesion
Most Divisive Votes
Votes with the closest margins between For and Against.
Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
2026-01-21
2026/2560(RSP)
334
vs
324
Margin: 10
C10-0063/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
2025-05-07
316
vs
291
Margin: 25
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
2025-10-22
2025/2041(INI)
310
vs
277
Margin: 33
Institutional aspects of the Report on the future of European Competitiveness (Draghi Report)
2025-11-25
2025/2013(INI)
330
vs
273
Margin: 57
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
2025-06-17
2025/2004(INI)
282
vs
340
Margin: 58
Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups
2025-11-26
2025/2072(INI)
360
vs
298
Margin: 62
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023
2025-05-22
2025/2027(INI)
260
vs
194
Margin: 66
A10-0175/2025 – Emma Wiesner, Pekka Toveri – Commission proposal
2025-10-21
327
vs
256
Margin: 71
Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness
2026-01-22
2025/2034(INI)
318
vs
247
Margin: 71
C10-0137/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
2025-07-09
300
vs
379
Margin: 79
Votes That Split Groups
Votes where political groups were most internally divided.
Resolution on Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine, the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution
2025-09-11
2025/2852(RSP)
67.1%
avg. group cohesion
B10-0506/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
2025-11-26
71.7%
avg. group cohesion
A10-0087/2025 – Inese Vaidere – Commission proposal
2025-05-22
75.5%
avg. group cohesion
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
2025-06-18
2024/2085(INI)
75.9%
avg. group cohesion
The European Water Resilience Strategy
2025-05-07
2024/2104(INI)
76.2%
avg. group cohesion
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Kosovo
2025-05-07
2025/2019(INI)
77.0%
avg. group cohesion
Protection of minors online
2025-11-26
2025/2060(INI)
78.2%
avg. group cohesion
B10-0318/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
2025-07-09
78.3%
avg. group cohesion
A10-0194/2025 – Evelyn Regner – Commission proposal
2025-11-13
79.1%
avg. group cohesion
B10-0311/2025 – Motion for a resolution
2025-07-09
79.3%
avg. group cohesion