Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
177 votesTackling barriers to the single market for defence
Require member states to aggregate defence demand through common procurement and simplify regulations to reduce reliance on non-EU countries.
EU enlargement strategy
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities – annual report 2026
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026
Demand prudent fiscal policies from Member States to preserve public debt sustainability, considering excessive deficit procedures.
Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors
Require Member States to fairly value work in female-dominated sectors and guarantee equal pay for work of equal value.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Resolution on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
No written explanations available.