Skip to content
Jana TOOM

Jana TOOM

RENEW (Renew Europe)
Eesti Keskerakond
Born 15 October 1966 in Tallinn

Political Group Memberships

Current RENEW Renew Europe
Jul 2024 – Feb 2026 (327 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

93.0%
Loyalty Rate
292
loyal votes
22
rebellious votes
Aligned Independent

Rebel Subjects

Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.

Public health 1 rebellious vote

Procedures

9 votes
Clear filters

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Continued war crimes committed by the Russian Federation, notably killing Ukrainian prisoners of war

17 Dec 2025 2024/2897(RSP)
Against

Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process

Demand stricter justification from the Commission for EU legislative action, ensuring respect for Member State competences and avoiding disguised extensions of power.

27 Nov 2025 2025/2042(INI)
Against

Resolution on protection of EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materials

Impose stricter controls on e-commerce platforms to remove illegal products like weapons and child-like sex dolls, enforcing consumer protection and safety.

26 Nov 2025 2025/2971(RSP)
Against

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
13 Mar 2025 For
View procedure →

Resolution on social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

As AI becomes more widespread, legislators should implement measures to protect workers from potential abuses. Although Parliament did not support the call for a directive, I am confident that we will be back to the this topic very soon. Unfortunately, valuable time will be lost in the meantime (paragraph 7, part 2). It is unfortunate that the proposal for an EU regulatory framework for the housing sector failed to gain majority support, especially since addressing the housing crisis is a key promise made by the Commission and Parliament to Europeans. Without a clear regulatory framework for the housing sector, it will be extremely meaningful difficult to achieve a progress (paragraph 13, original text, part 2). As the rapporteur for the INI report on the right to disconnect, I welcome the initiative for a repetition of the call of the directive. However, it is disappointing that Parliament must once again reiterate its position to the Commission, especially given that, despite its promises in the 2025 work programme, the Commission itself lacks a 'right to disconnect' (paragraph 31, part 4).