Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
149 votesImplementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
Extend the deadline for mature Recovery and Resilience Facility projects by 18 months.
Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy
Prioritise cohesion policy funding towards rural areas to address demographic decline, improve services, and modernise agriculture.
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the declaration of input (Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure)
Require rapporteurs to list interest groups and third-country representatives providing input on their reports.
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023
Increase citizen awareness of petition rights through a structured information campaign in all EU languages.
Resolution on the old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market
Fund customs authorities and market surveillance to combat illicit goods sold on e-commerce platforms.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) firmly believes that the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation Hamas on 7 October 2023 must never be allowed to happen again. We stand united in our solidarity with Israel and its right to defend itself and its people. This right is enshrined in and constrained by international law. In order to relieve humanitarian suffering, we support diplomatic efforts to resume the ceasefire and restart the negotiations immediately. This must include the unconditional release of all hostages and the return of the remains of the hostages deceased. Further, the EPP Group unequivocally rejects terrorism and antisemitism in all its forms. Yet, the EPP Group has decided to vote against Amendments 145, 147, 154, 159, and 150 given the broader political dynamics at play. The amendments at hand were introduced last minute by a political group, which did not participate in the negotiations of the report. While the proposals may have merit in isolation, they do not offer substantive changes to the already adopted language of this report. Hence, we consider that a vote against these amendments will not weaken our political message, and at the same time maximise the chances to adopt the report as a whole.
No written explanations available.