Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
19 votes2024 budget – assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budget
Require the Commission to develop a comprehensive methodology for gender budgeting, fully operational by the next programming period.
Gender Equality Strategy 2025
Require the Commission to propose legislation criminalising rape without explicit consent and guaranteeing universal access to sexual and reproductive health services.
Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore
Resolution on the Second World Summit for Social Development
Demand that the Commission and Member States implement the European Pillar of Social Rights with investments in poverty reduction and carbon neutrality.
Motion of censure on the Commission
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) firmly believes that the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation Hamas on 7 October 2023 must never be allowed to happen again. We stand united in our solidarity with Israel and its right to defend itself and its people. This right is enshrined in and constrained by international law. In order to relieve humanitarian suffering, we support diplomatic efforts to resume the ceasefire and restart the negotiations immediately. This must include the unconditional release of all hostages and the return of the remains of the hostages deceased. Further, the EPP Group unequivocally rejects terrorism and antisemitism in all its forms. Yet, the EPP Group has decided to vote against Amendments 145, 147, 154, 159, and 150 given the broader political dynamics at play. The amendments at hand were introduced last minute by a political group, which did not participate in the negotiations of the report. While the proposals may have merit in isolation, they do not offer substantive changes to the already adopted language of this report. Hence, we consider that a vote against these amendments will not weaken our political message, and at the same time maximise the chances to adopt the report as a whole.
No written explanations available.