Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
16 votesSecurity of energy supply in the EU
Ban all Russian natural gas imports into the EU by 2027, and new/spot contracts by end of 2025.
Resolution on the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia
Demand Russia provide information on and ensure the return of deported Ukrainian children.
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Ombudsman
Demand faster access to requested documents from EU institutions to improve administrative transparency for citizens.
Resolution on the escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
Impose sanctions on M23 commanders and Rwandan officials involved in the Democratic Republic of Congo conflict.
B10-0060/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) firmly believes that the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation Hamas on 7 October 2023 must never be allowed to happen again. We stand united in our solidarity with Israel and its right to defend itself and its people. This right is enshrined in and constrained by international law. In order to relieve humanitarian suffering, we support diplomatic efforts to resume the ceasefire and restart the negotiations immediately. This must include the unconditional release of all hostages and the return of the remains of the hostages deceased. Further, the EPP Group unequivocally rejects terrorism and antisemitism in all its forms. Yet, the EPP Group has decided to vote against Amendments 145, 147, 154, 159, and 150 given the broader political dynamics at play. The amendments at hand were introduced last minute by a political group, which did not participate in the negotiations of the report. While the proposals may have merit in isolation, they do not offer substantive changes to the already adopted language of this report. Hence, we consider that a vote against these amendments will not weaken our political message, and at the same time maximise the chances to adopt the report as a whole.
No written explanations available.