Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
149 votes2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Serbia
Condition Serbia's EU accession on aligning with EU foreign policy and implementing rule of law reforms.
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye
Demand Turkey strengthen democratic governance, end restrictions on fundamental freedoms, and align with EU foreign policy for closer partnership.
The European Water Resilience Strategy
Require Member States to address water supply network leaks and implement Drinking Water Directive monitoring.
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world
Increase the next Multiannual Financial Framework to finance European public goods, defence, and ecological and digital transitions.
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings
Approve the 2023 budget implementation for all EU Joint Undertakings, urging improved financial controls and efficient fund allocation.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) firmly believes that the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation Hamas on 7 October 2023 must never be allowed to happen again. We stand united in our solidarity with Israel and its right to defend itself and its people. This right is enshrined in and constrained by international law. In order to relieve humanitarian suffering, we support diplomatic efforts to resume the ceasefire and restart the negotiations immediately. This must include the unconditional release of all hostages and the return of the remains of the hostages deceased. Further, the EPP Group unequivocally rejects terrorism and antisemitism in all its forms. Yet, the EPP Group has decided to vote against Amendments 145, 147, 154, 159, and 150 given the broader political dynamics at play. The amendments at hand were introduced last minute by a political group, which did not participate in the negotiations of the report. While the proposals may have merit in isolation, they do not offer substantive changes to the already adopted language of this report. Hence, we consider that a vote against these amendments will not weaken our political message, and at the same time maximise the chances to adopt the report as a whole.
No written explanations available.