Skip to content
Christian DOLESCHAL

Christian DOLESCHAL

PPE (European People's Party)
Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
Born 27 April 1988 in KEMNATH

Political Group Memberships

Current PPE European People's Party
Jul 2024 – Feb 2026 (322 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

97.7%
Loyalty Rate
299
loyal votes
7
rebellious votes
Aligned Independent

Rebel Subjects

Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.

Citizen's rights 1 rebellious vote
Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter 1 rebellious vote
Social policy, social charter and protocol 1 rebellious vote

Procedures

177 votes

Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025

Condition EU funding to non-EU countries on respecting human rights and democratic principles.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2166(INI)
For

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

Maintain and expand sanctions against Russia and states supporting its aggression, including Belarus, Iran, and North Korea.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2165(INI)
For

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

Demand a coherent EU foreign policy to defend international order, foster cooperation, and respect neutrality amidst global instability.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2164(INI)
For

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
02 Apr 2025 For
View procedure →

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024

The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) firmly believes that the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation Hamas on 7 October 2023 must never be allowed to happen again. We stand united in our solidarity with Israel and its right to defend itself and its people. This right is enshrined in and constrained by international law. In order to relieve humanitarian suffering, we support diplomatic efforts to resume the ceasefire and restart the negotiations immediately. This must include the unconditional release of all hostages and the return of the remains of the hostages deceased. Further, the EPP Group unequivocally rejects terrorism and antisemitism in all its forms. Yet, the EPP Group has decided to vote against Amendments 145, 147, 154, 159, and 150 given the broader political dynamics at play. The amendments at hand were introduced last minute by a political group, which did not participate in the negotiations of the report. While the proposals may have merit in isolation, they do not offer substantive changes to the already adopted language of this report. Hence, we consider that a vote against these amendments will not weaken our political message, and at the same time maximise the chances to adopt the report as a whole.