Skip to content
Riho TERRAS

Riho TERRAS

PPE (European People's Party)
Isamaa
Born 17 April 1967 in Kohtla-Järve

Political Group Memberships

Current PPE European People's Party
Jul 2024 – Feb 2026 (343 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

95.6%
Loyalty Rate
323
loyal votes
15
rebellious votes
Aligned Independent

Rebel Subjects

Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.

Competition 1 rebellious vote
Employment policy, action to combat unemployment 1 rebellious vote
Public health 1 rebellious vote

Procedures

24 votes
Clear filters

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

12 Feb 2026 2025/2133(INI)
Against

Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025

Condition EU funding to non-EU countries on respecting human rights and democratic principles.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2166(INI)
Against

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

Maintain and expand sanctions against Russia and states supporting its aggression, including Belarus, Iran, and North Korea.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2165(INI)
Against

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

Demand a coherent EU foreign policy to defend international order, foster cooperation, and respect neutrality amidst global instability.

21 Jan 2026 2025/2164(INI)
Against

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
26 Nov 2025 Against
View procedure →

Protection of minors online

Social media has many problems which affect young people in negative ways. While I theoretically agree that there should be some age limit, it is very difficult to enforce it in practice. If providing age is purely declarative, then children will simply lie about their age, which is the situation today when platforms’ terms of service impose an age limit. Using eID means to prove your age to a social media platform is disproportionate. eID means are intended mainly for proving your identity for serious tasks such as e-government services and private services which require a high degree of security, such as banking. It is theoretically possible under eIDAS to prove your age without revealing your identity, but there are no guarantees that social media will implement this and refrain from asking for more than they need. Many citizens will not understand these intricacies, they will believe that using the eID always equates to proving your identity and they do not want this for social media. This will reduce trust in eID and will hamper its uptake, which harms our digitalisation efforts. This is why I voted against this report. All measures to tackle this problem need to be proportional.