Thijs REUTEN
Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
200 votesDigitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
Regulate algorithmic management in the workplace to ensure human oversight, transparency, and worker protection against data misuse and health risks.
European Defence Readiness 2030: assessment of needs
Increase defence spending to 5% of GDP annually by 2035, prioritising joint procurement and intra-EU trade.
Military mobility
Fund military infrastructure upgrades and remove cross-border barriers to accelerate troop and equipment movement within the EU.
Relations between the EU and Saudi Arabia
Deepen cooperation with Saudi Arabia on energy, counterterrorism, and regional stability, while demanding human rights improvements and labour rights reforms.
Resolution on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine
Demand Russia compensate Ukraine for damages and withdraw forces for a lasting peace, backed by international security guarantees and frozen assets.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU‘s need to adapt to be fit for today‘s security challenges
GL-PvdA supports this report, as it offers valuable perspectives on adapting the Member States’ armed forces, EU programmes and institutions to challenges in relation to the integration of drones, anti-drone measures and other innovative systems of warfare. The geopolitical situation and swift changes in global alliances merit supporting the overall report. However, GL-PvdA explicitly distances itself from the Frontex references in paragraphs 39, 323 and 324. We strongly oppose this report’s language advocating for an of Frontex mandate expansion, to include military capabilities and tasks, which dangerously blurs the line between defence and border management. Due to previous human right abuses by Frontex, affording quasi-military powers entails significant risks, and requires a radical shift in its modus operandi, oversight, and legal framework. While limited information exchange between Frontex and armed forces, in line with data protection and fundamental rights obligations, may be pertinent, the mandate for territorial defence must remain the exclusive responsibility of our armed forces, that have clearly defined democratic and legal frameworks. Moreover, the European Commission foresees a revision of the Frontex Regulation in 2026. Taking a Parliamentary position on such a sensitive matter is premature.
No written explanations available.