Procédures
33 votesMise en œuvre du régime de conditionnalité liée à l'état de droit
Conditionner le versement des fonds européens au respect de l'état de droit par les États membres, en renforçant les contrôles et la transparence.
Résolution sur la protection des consommateurs de l’Union contre les pratiques de certaines plateformes de commerce électronique: le cas des poupées sexuelles d’apparence enfantine, des armes et d’autres produits et matériels illégaux
Imposer aux plateformes en ligne des sanctions plus rapides et effectives en cas de vente répétée de produits illégaux ou dangereux.
Budget 2024: évaluation de la mise en œuvre de la méthode d’intégration de la dimension de genre dans le budget de l'Union
Conditionner les financements européens à des objectifs précis de réduction des inégalités de genre.
Aspects institutionnels du rapport sur l'avenir de la compétitivité européenne (rapport Draghi)
Réformer la gouvernance européenne pour accélérer la prise de décision, simplifier la législation, et renforcer l'action de l'UE sur le marché unique, la décarbonation et la défense.
Stratégie en faveur de l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes 2025
Criminaliser les violences faites aux femmes, garantir l'accès aux soins de santé et réduire les inégalités salariales et de retraite entre hommes et femmes.
Explications de vote
Explications de vote soumises après les sessions plénières.
Motion de censure visant la Commission
The censure motion against Commission President von der Leyen was politically uncoordinated, lacked strategic backing and was always set to fail. It did not reflect the broader view of many in the ECR Group, nor of the Latvian delegation. While I have been critical of the Commission's direction on several fronts, including its inconsistent handling of security and migration, supporting this motion would have meant derailing ongoing work that is directly tied to Latvia’s and the Baltic region’s interests. Key Commissioners responsible for defence, external affairs and reducing EU‑level bureaucracy are advancing files critical for our region. Dismissing the entire Commission mid‑mandate would have frozen progress for months and shifted focus from delivery to internal political games. That is not a risk we can afford, not with war on our border and major legislative files in motion – from Ukraine support to defence industry investment. Had the motion succeeded, there was also no guarantee that the Baltics would retain influence in the next College. The stakes are too high for gamble‑based politics. Change must come through pressure, not paralysis. This motion offered no credible alternative, only disruption. That is why I voted against it.
Résolution sur la nécessité d’un soutien continu de l’Union à l’Ukraine
My vote in support for the resolution was a part of the whole – of the European Parliament’s vote to reaffirm its stance and reveal the true colours of us all. Supporting Ukraine is not an act of charity. From Europeans opening their homes to the supply of arms, this is about our values. Ignoring this jeopardises our future, our democracy, and the values we hold dear. Russia’s war in the heart of Europe affects us all. We must triumph both on the ground in Ukraine and in the hearts and minds across our alliance. Russia’s ability to sustain a prolonged war, its disinformation campaigns, the cost-of-living crisis in Europe and upheavals across the globe threaten the support Ukraine desperately needs. Russia cannot prevail. The free world needs a strategy to end this. The key is in whether we will ‘support as long as it takes’ or ‘whatever it takes’ until Ukraine’s victory. From our different perspectives on how this should end, we need to harness our collective strength. Our commitment is to victory, not attrition; liberation, not a stalemate. This requires action, small and large, and maybe even a Casablanca conference of our own to decide how Russia shall be decisively defeated.
Aucune explication de vote disponible.