Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
184 votesResolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States
Require Member States to harmonise accessibility of voting for people with disabilities and publicise European parties' affiliations.
Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Increase humanitarian aid funding and prioritise protection for humanitarian workers in conflict zones.
Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties
Prioritise a Capital Markets Union agenda to support EU competitiveness without compromising financial stability.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure
Wir stehen in einem entscheidenden Jahr. Der Zustand der digitalen Infrastruktur und die technologische Souveränität Europas hängen maßgeblich von den kommenden Vorschlägen der Europäischen Kommission ab. Mit diesem Bericht senden wir eine klare und zeitgemäße Botschaft an die Kommission. Wir formulieren darin unsere Erwartungen an die künftige Gesetzgebung der Europäischen Union. Der Bericht wurde vollständig von der pro-europäischen Mehrheit im Industrieausschuss erarbeitet. Die sogenannte „Berichterstatterin“ Knafo hatte darauf keinen inhaltlichen Einfluss. Dass die extrem rechte Politikerin ihren Namen auf einem Bericht belässt, der keine einzige originäre Textzeile von ihr enthält, ist ein durchsichtiges Manöver aus innenpolitischen Gründen. Umso bemerkenswerter ist, dass derselbe Bericht ihre eigene Partei – gemeinsam mit der AfD – ausdrücklich als mitverantwortlich für antidemokratische Einflussnahmen ausländischer Regierungen auf die europäische digitale Gesetzgebung benennt. Klar ist: Die extreme Rechte darf keinen Einfluss auf die Sachentscheidungen des Parlaments haben – und damit auch nicht auf die Lebensverhältnisse der Menschen in Europa. Mit diesem Bericht ist genau das gelungen.
No written explanations available.