Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
200 votesResolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States
Require Member States to harmonise accessibility of voting for people with disabilities and publicise European parties' affiliations.
Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Increase humanitarian aid funding and prioritise protection for humanitarian workers in conflict zones.
Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties
Prioritise a Capital Markets Union agenda to support EU competitiveness without compromising financial stability.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Resolution on continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States
Pur riconoscendo l’importanza di sostenere l'Ucraina nella sua legittima difesa contro l'aggressione russa, ho espresso voto contrario a questa risoluzione. Durante il mio intervento in aula a Strasburgo ho fermamente condannato l'approccio alla politica "dei due pesi e delle due misure" portata avanti dalla Commissione europea e dall'alto rappresentante Borrell. Infatti, si chiede ancora un cessate il fuoco immediato in Medio Oriente e si promette, invece, guerra a oltranza per l'Ucraina senza alcuna logica. Inoltre, la rimozione delle restrizioni sull'uso delle armi occidentali contro obiettivi in territorio russo è una posizione contraria all'indirizzo di de-escalation espressamente manifestato dal governo italiano. Tale misura è molto pericolosa e rischia di aggravare ulteriormente il conflitto, allontanando la prospettiva di una soluzione diplomatica e aumentando il rischio di coinvolgimento della NATO. Il testo, inoltre, attacca la posizione dell'Ungheria, che con il Premier Viktor Orbán ha cercato di svolgere un ruolo di mediazione provando a mantenere aperti i canali diplomatici con la Russia. Riaffermo quindi la mia contrarietà a un approccio che ignora la necessità di una soluzione diplomatica duratura e che si allontana dai principi di pace e libertà che hanno ispirato la nascita dell'Unione europea.
No written explanations available.