Procédures
20 votesMotion de censure visant la Commission
Motion de censure visant la Commission
Résolution sur la situation en Colombie après la vague d'attentats terroristes récents
Financer le processus de paix en Colombie et enquêter sur les crimes transnationaux pour contrer le terrorisme et protéger les droits humains.
L'avenir de l'agriculture et la politique agricole commune après 2027
Financer la PAC post-2027 avec un budget spécifique et indexé sur l'inflation pour garantir la sécurité alimentaire et la souveraineté européenne.
Délibérations de la commission des pétitions en 2023
Mener une campagne d'information sur le droit de pétition auprès des citoyens européens, en ciblant les populations rurales et marginalisées.
Explications de vote
Explications de vote soumises après les sessions plénières.
Résolution sur l’initiative citoyenne européenne «My Voice, My Choice: pour un avortement sans danger et accessible»
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
Aucune explication de vote disponible.