Procédures
20 votesRecommandation du Conseil sur les environnements sans fumée et sans aérosols
Présentation du collège des commissaires et de leur programme par la présidente élue de la Commission
Présentation du collège des commissaires et de leur programme par la présidente élue de la Commission
Résolution sur la situation au Venezuela
Imposer des sanctions ciblées contre Nicolás Maduro et son cercle restreint pour fraude électorale et violations des droits humains au Venezuela.
Résolution sur le cas de José Daniel Ferrer García à Cuba
Exiger la libération immédiate de José Daniel Ferrer García et de tous les prisonniers politiques arbitrairement détenus à Cuba.
Explications de vote
Explications de vote soumises après les sessions plénières.
Résolution sur l’initiative citoyenne européenne «My Voice, My Choice: pour un avortement sans danger et accessible»
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
Aucune explication de vote disponible.