Skip to content
Maria NOICHL

Maria NOICHL

S&D (Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats)
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
Born 09 January 1967 in Rosenheim

Political Group Memberships

Current S&D Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Jul 2024 – Feb 2026 (341 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

97.3%
Loyalty Rate
328
loyal votes
9
rebellious votes
Aligned Independent

Rebel Subjects

Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.

Agricultural policy and economies 1 rebellious vote

Procedures

18 votes
Clear filters

Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness

Require measurable indicators for EU-funded projects to ensure traceability, transparency, and auditability, especially for competitiveness and resilience measures.

22 Jan 2026 2025/2034(INI)
Against

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Against

Continued war crimes committed by the Russian Federation, notably killing Ukrainian prisoners of war

17 Dec 2025 2024/2897(RSP)
Against

Relations between the EU and Saudi Arabia

Deepen cooperation with Saudi Arabia on energy, counterterrorism, and regional stability, while demanding human rights improvements and labour rights reforms.

16 Dec 2025 2025/2082(INI)
Against

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
22 Jan 2026 For DE
View procedure →

European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure

Wir stehen in einem entscheidenden Jahr. Der Zustand der digitalen Infrastruktur und die technologische Souveränität Europas hängen maßgeblich von den kommenden Vorschlägen der Europäischen Kommission ab. Mit diesem Bericht senden wir eine klare und zeitgemäße Botschaft an die Kommission. Wir formulieren darin unsere Erwartungen an die künftige Gesetzgebung der Europäischen Union. Der Bericht wurde vollständig von der pro-europäischen Mehrheit im Industrieausschuss erarbeitet. Die sogenannte „Berichterstatterin“ Knafo hatte darauf keinen inhaltlichen Einfluss. Dass die extrem rechte Politikerin ihren Namen auf einem Bericht belässt, der keine einzige originäre Textzeile von ihr enthält, ist ein durchsichtiges Manöver aus innenpolitischen Gründen. Umso bemerkenswerter ist, dass derselbe Bericht ihre eigene Partei – gemeinsam mit der AfD – ausdrücklich als mitverantwortlich für antidemokratische Einflussnahmen ausländischer Regierungen auf die europäische digitale Gesetzgebung benennt. Klar ist: Die extreme Rechte darf keinen Einfluss auf die Sachentscheidungen des Parlaments haben – und damit auch nicht auf die Lebensverhältnisse der Menschen in Europa. Mit diesem Bericht ist genau das gelungen.