Skip to content
Jean-Marc GERMAIN

Jean-Marc GERMAIN

S&D (Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats)
Parti socialiste
Born 12 June 1966 in Lyon

Political Group Memberships

Current S&D Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Sep 2024 – Feb 2026 (323 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

97.4%
Loyalty Rate
299
loyal votes
8
rebellious votes
Aligned Independent

Procedures

188 votes

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
Did Not Vote

Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part

Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.

21 Jan 2026 2026/2560(RSP)
For

Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States

Require Member States to harmonise accessibility of voting for people with disabilities and publicise European parties' affiliations.

20 Jan 2026 2025/2028(INI)
For

Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises

Increase humanitarian aid funding and prioritise protection for humanitarian workers in conflict zones.

20 Jan 2026 2025/2085(INI)
For

Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties

Prioritise a Capital Markets Union agenda to support EU competitiveness without compromising financial stability.

20 Jan 2026 2025/2051(INI)
For

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
18 Dec 2025 For FR
View procedure →

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Ce rapport revient sur la mise en œuvre du mécanisme de conditionnalité adopté fin 2020 et activé pour la première fois à l'encontre de la Hongrie en 2022. Il porte un message clair: le mécanisme de conditionnalité est un outil efficace, mais son application doit être plus forte, plus cohérente et plus transparente. À cet égard, notre rapport appelle à augmenter la proportion des financements gelés dans des cas systémiques, comme celui de la Hongrie, à garantir l’accès au financement des bénéficiaires finaux impactés, sans pour autant diluer l’impact du mécanisme, et à assurer que les fonds gelés ne puissent être débloqués ou reprogrammés qu’en contrepartie de mesures correctives effectives. En tant que co-rapporteur, j'ai également tenu à ce que nous ouvrions la voie à une extension du champ de la conditionnalité à l'ensemble des valeurs de l'article 2 des traités, tout en renforçant le soutien aux lanceurs d'alerte et aux organes d'enquête tels quel le Parquet européen. Notre rapport n’ayant pas été dénaturé par des amendements contraires à son esprit, j’ai voté en sa faveur.