Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
102 votesResolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Increase humanitarian aid funding and prioritise protection for humanitarian workers in conflict zones.
Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies
Require Member States to develop national strategies for managing the labour market transition towards a green and digital economy.
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
Create a unified European company form (S.EU) with €1 minimum capital, digital registration within 48 hours, and optional employee participation schemes.
Resolution on the political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the Rohingya
Demand an immediate ceasefire and end to violence against civilians, ethnic minorities, and political opponents in Myanmar.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report
Valoramos positivamente que el texto reconozca avances relevantes en materia de Estado de Derecho. Celebramos, especialmente, el reconocimiento del derecho a la unión de personas del mismo género en el conjunto de la Unión Europea, lo que refuerza los principios de igualdad y no discriminación. Asimismo, es importante que el informe aborde la independencia de los medios de comunicación como elemento esencial en una democracia. Sin embargo, consideramos que se debe ir más allá: es fundamental garantizar la independencia real del poder judicial, reforzar los mecanismos de vigilancia y lucha contra la corrupción y denunciar, con claridad, prácticas como el control de los medios públicos por parte de los Gobiernos o la infiltración de policías en movimientos sociales. Nos hemos abstenido porque el informe contiene, además, una crítica genérica e injustificada a las leyes de amnistía y los procedimientos de indulto. Se trata de instrumentos plenamente legales en los sistemas democráticos, avalados por el ordenamiento jurídico español y por su Tribunal Constitucional, siempre que respeten los principios de legalidad y proporcionalidad. Cuestionarlos sin atender a su contexto concreto contribuye a estigmatizar herramientas que, en muchos casos, han permitido resolver conflictos y avanzar en la protección de derechos y libertades fundamentales.
No written explanations available.